Featured image of post Escaping Callback Hell with Generic SuspendCoroutine Infix Extension Functions

Escaping Callback Hell with Generic SuspendCoroutine Infix Extension Functions

Callback hell happens all the time in Android. Luckily, with coroutines, there’s an easy way out.

So you’re hopefully aware of callback hell, which makes your code difficult to read, and also makes the sequence of events difficult to understand. This is something we want to avoid, but it’s not always easy. If you’re using any sort of third-party library, (like Firebase) you’re probably forced into this pattern regularly. A simple callback would look like this:

As you can see, we’re one level into callbacks. At a glance, it would seem like the result would be handled immediately after sending out the saveUsername function. But it in fact creates an asynchronous task (most likely on the IO thread). Which means the order of events quickly becomes unclear, especially to a new developer climbing on the project. An experienced dev would know that the order of events isn’t clear, but it’ll take a few minutes to fully comprehend what the actual order is.

However, if your operation is suitable for coroutines (such as API calls, disk writes or background processes) we can “flatten” the callback hell fairly easily.


I’m assuming you’re aware of coroutines and suspendFunctions already. If not, it’s time to start using them. First, I need to introduce suspendCoroutine. The official documentation on suspendCoroutine doesn’t make it particularly clear. But this StackOverflow answer provides a good idea of how to use it. So if we were to write a suspendCoroutine version of our function, it would look like this:

As you can see, the saveUsername function has turned into a function which returns the result in the same line, but can only be called from a coroutineContext/suspendFunction. This is perfect for making your code look cleaner and run in sequence with more confidence.

However, it requires you to write a suspendCoroutine function for each function you want to flatten in this way. This adds a lot of boilerplate. So is there some way we can use generics to avoid this boilerplate? Of course!

Generic SuspendCoroutine

If you read my first article on kotlin generics you’ll know that the IntelliJ IDE is smarter than us, so we’ll use it to generate our function. We’ll call our function suspendAsync() and pass in our method, along with the input, and see what happens. Remember you can pass a method reference with instance::method

compiler error

If you see this warning, you're headed in the right direction.

Then IntelliJ creates a function which looks like this:

compiler result

Not generic yet.

And through a little bit of Generic reworking, as well as my knowledge of KFunction analogues, I replaced the <String> input and output types with generic types, resulting in this function:

As you can see, it’s about the same as our previous function. The difference is, you can pass in any function which takes a single input and a function callback, and it becomes a one-liner instead of a callback.

If you want to pass in two inputs, it’s slightly trickier, but still very doable:

And there you have it. You can reduce any qualifying callback with these functions. Other variations can be covered with a few more generic functions. However, it doesn’t feel very nice calling a function in this way. First you write suspendAsync, then you pass in the function you actually want to call? Not the best, because we’re used to referencing the function we want to call first.

So maybe we can do better?

Generic Infix SuspendCoroutine Extension Function

I like the infix notation in Kotlin, though I usually avoid it because it’s a little dangerous and it’s not easy for new developers to discover it’s usage in any given codebase. In this case the increased readability and ease of use may be worth it.

So using the same method of letting the IDE generate our function for us, we write out the infix function we want. I call it suspendAndInvokeWith, because we are invoking a function, turning it into a suspend function, and passing in arguments.

compiler result

If it wasn't for compiler suggestions I'd be useless.

Which we clean up and genericify a little bit into our result:

This feels a lot more natural. You start out by writing the function you would normally write, using the infix notation and passing in your input.

Infix functions require only a single input, so if you want to pass in more than one argument into a function, you need to do it by using Pairs or Triples, like so:

And there you have it. This won’t work on everything, but it’s a start to reducing boilerplate.


At Flat Circle, we’re trying to make our code as readable as possible, and found that using coroutines and avoiding callback hell is a good way to go about doing this. So we built these infix notations (and a few other utility functions) into a little CoroutineHelper Library to make our lives easier. Please go ahead and use that library or copy the code to help make your code as readable as possible.


Callback hell isn’t the end of the world, but sometimes it can add just a little bit too much confusion to an already complex lifecycle. Hopefully with Coroutines, coupled with the techniques and Generic Utility functions above, you can reduce callback hell a little bit in your code.

comments powered by Disqus